Monday, June 9, 2008

Beatrice or succubus? the male author's Muse

Many male authors, composers, and scholars in the Western canon took as their inspiration a spiritualized female figure. The Greeks gave us their Muses, with their corresponding mythology of creativity. For example, we refer to an author's "muse" interchangeably as either an actual woman who inspires him, or as an abstract spirit of inspiration. Dante Alighieri's Beatrice is perhaps the most notable specific instance. The author's "La Vita Nuova" and "Divine Comedy" detail the process by which an actual, living Florentine woman (Bice di Folco Portinari) was transformed from a passing fancy, into a spiritual guide who leads Dante to the very face of God. A lesser-known example is Sophie von Kuehn, the wife of Georg Philipp Friedrich Freiherr von Hardenberg (better known by his pen name Novalis). After Sophie passed away at the young age of 16, she inspired the young philosopher and mining engineer to produce an entire body of unique verse, prose, and essays, by which he is credited as a father of early German Romanticism. Inscribed in Novalis' wedding ring was the phrase "Sophia sei mein Schutzgeist" ("Sophie, be my guardian spirit"), and he often played on the Greek meaning of her name: "Wisdom," frequently personified in the Judeo-Christian tradition as a noble woman.

This spiritualization of the Muse is a process, rather than a static attribute. It happens primarily in the mind of the creative male subject, rather than to the female object. The last line of Goethe's Faust summarizes this process: "Das Ewig-Weibliche zieht uns hinan" ("The Eternal Feminine draws us on"). Man first experiences love as concrete and sexual (whether consummated or not). Then, circumstances (unfulfilled love, separation, and perhaps even the death of the beloved) train him to disembody and spiritualize that love so that it becomes a spiritual guide. The lover is drawn on by the noble beloved to seek higher and more noble things.

The training of the lover by the beloved is a familiar theme from courtly love. This is particularly fitting since the troubadour often sings from the first-person perspective of the male lover: the unattained beloved inspires beautiful music, even as she draws out his weeping and sighs. In Wolfram von Eschenbach's "Parzival," for instance, the protagonist's wife is named Condwiramurs, which means "love guide." Wolfram changes her name from Blanchefleur, by which she appears in his source material (Chr�tien de Troyes' "Perceval"), so as to emphasize how the thought of her guides Parzival on his many lonely journeys and eventually draws him out of religious despair and back to his quest for the Grail.

This name change also highlights Wolfram's deliberate and arguably awkward choice to desexualize her first encounter with Parzival, in which she convinces him to defend her town from a siege. Chr�tien simply has her seduce the naive young Parzival, who happened to be passing through her town during the siege. In contrast, Wolfram emphasizes her chaste intentions: She visits him at night specifically to convince him to fight for her home, but has no sexual intentions. It is nevertheless a sexually charged encounter: she crawls into his bed, clutches him, and weeps. One should also recall the habit of the time to sleep in the nude. However, "nothing happens," though Parzival had acted less than nobly with another woman before (he robbed her of her jewelry and nearly raped her). She asks him "not to wrestle" (i.e., not to exploit her vulnerable position so as to have sex with her), and Parzival honors this request. Here, it's the woman who drives the desexualization process; in other cases, circumstances drive it. For example, Dante rarely saw Beatrice, and eventually she married another man and passed away at age 24. Novalis lost his young wife after only three years of marriage. Parzival does eventually return to Condwiramurs, but only after finding the Grail.

Sometimes, men enter into this separation process deliberately, rather than letting circumstances bring it to them. For example, the New York Times recently interviewed a Buddhist couple who have taken an unorthodox vow of conjugal celibacy. Sts. Francis and Clare of Assisi form an analogous (though much less extreme) pair in the Western Christian tradition. Francis, himself first a troubadour, chooses a religious life of poverty and preaching, and ordains Clare into the religious life. Some stories even have the young Francis fall in love with Clare, and others depict him as dying in her arms. In a traditional Roman Catholic parish last weekend, the pastor defended priestly celibacy in his sermon by arguing that though priests in ancient times were allowed to be married, they were required to live apart from their wives after ordination. (Whether this is true or not is less interesting than the fact that he mentions it!)

Situations such as this exploit the tension between spiritual companionship and sexual desire. At times this tension has theurgical overtones. On occasion it finds expression directly in terms of the sexual act: for instance, Chinese emperors of the Qing Dynasty were taught that forestalling ejaculation whenever possible would magically add years to their life. More often, it takes a more abstract form as "courtly love" nonsexual relationships. Charles Williams, the 20th century English author and poet, was reputed to have followed this practice. Williams would have been well aware of the theurgical implications from his training in the Western esoteric tradition. In that tradition, nonsexual theurgical relationships later devolved into actual sexual practice (what many self-identifying neopagans call "sex magick"), as described for example in the novels of Dion Fortune. The fundamental idea in these nonsexual relationships is to generate sexual tension, and then by resisting its physical expression, "sublimate" it into a higher spiritual force. This makes the Muse a vessel for creative intellectual work, just as the female body serves (in arguably sexist magical thinking) as the vessel of creation in physical terms.

In his short story "Calliope," Neal Gaiman unites the intellectual and physical roles of the Muse: his protagonist author regains his creativity by magically enslaving and physically raping the Greek Muse Calliope. This illustrates the dark side of the spiritualized female figure: she remains Object to the male as Subject. He creates alone, without her cooperation, and projects an image upon her which obscures her actual identity and makes her ever more divorced from reality. She dies, lies unconscious in a coma (as described fictionally in Williams' 1931 novel "Many Dimensions," whose female protagonist some have argued was modeled after his lover Phyllis Jones), or is simply inaccessible and therefore ever more ripe for projection. Furthermore, Dante Alighieri and Charles Williams were married (not to their Muses), and Novalis was engaged to marry Julie von Charpentier the year after Sophie's death (though he died before their marriage). Keeping a Muse was for them a kind of intellectual (and actual, in Williams' case!) adultery.

Williams did, however, understand well the consequences of this projection process. In his 1937 novel "Descent into Hell," one of his male characters descends so deeply into a fantasized relationship with a particular woman, that his fantasies become a succubus that leads him to despair and suicide. While undergoing this process, he encounters the actual woman, and she is so taken with fear that she flees from him: he has detached the fantasy entirely from reality. Despite Williams' dabbling in the darker aspects of Muse-keeping, one need only read his collected letters to his wife Florence Conway ("To Michal from Serge") to learn the depths of his intense and very real love for her. Novalis may have transformed his first wife into a "Schutzgeist," but he still weeps at her tomb, as depicted in "Hymn to the Night." One also sees in the "Divine Comedy" how even the spiritualized Beatrice is still very much a woman who attracts Dante, whose shining eyes and half-mocking smile have a power over him which is chaste but by no means nonsexual. The examples of these three authors -- Dante Alighieri, Friedrich von Hardenberg, and Charles Williams -- show the moral tension of taking on a Muse, but also show the importance and value of staying grounded in the reality of the female person -- physical, spiritual, intellectual, intelligent, an equal Subject in her own right.

10 comments:

Kate said...

...interesting.

First off, it makes me think and I am going to want to process this for a bit before I go commenting at greater depth.

Secondly, I'm reminded of the large number of female fanfic writers I know -- many of whom will claim male muses, frequently either the character or the actor portraying the character about whom they write most often.

An interesting case of something I'm sure, especially when combined with the frequent male-male interactions found in such fanfic.

Yes, I think hard about slash. Did you expect anything less? :)

HilbertAstronaut said...

Oh, I didn't see your comment!

I'm very much curious about how female writers, especially modern ones, perceive the "abstracted male" -- how he serves as a sort of muse to them. Do you have specific examples to share? My research tends to be <= 20th century and so most of the writers with whom I have experience are male.

Kate said...

I'm gonna have to go digging a bit -- I'm afraid I've got out of the habit of reading fanfic recently, but let me see what I can come up with...

A few quotes; I don't have time (or brain) to synthesize right now.

A personification of one of my writing Muses, Fanfic Muse looks like Logan Echolls, except Fanfic Muse has a toga and wings. (My default Muse looks a lot like Keanu Reeves.)

My fanfic muse returned. Only now it's wearing a battered duster, a felt hat, a pair of tight pants and a really nice...gun.

So, my muse is at times a really big kitty. Other times it’s a biotch.

But I wanna get something done, and since this is the one story I could probably write without having to have a real touch of the muse – and not just a fleeting sight of his pale ass – I’m going to work on this.


And a story about someone's muse.

A few generalities: sexy. Somewhat feminized. Frequently uncooperative. Nearly always a smartass.

Note that this is all fanfic writers -- and how they compare with others, I really don't know, I don't believe I've ever heard a published athur taking about her male muse. So whether this generalizes to all female writers I have no idea.

Muses are a part of the fanfic culture, as well, so one's view of one's muse is (I suspect) strongly influenced by what others have to say about theirs.

Conclusions? None, really. But here's a bit of data to play with, if naught else.

HilbertAstronaut said...

Many thanks for the data points! I should have emphasized more in the article that I was speaking of male writers and female muses -- there's a 2x2 matrix of combinations to which I didn't refer. I have pondered the female writer, female muse variety, but it's hard to imagine the full set of implications from my perspective.

It makes sense that muses are often uncooperative ;-) The occasional bright flash of sarcasm seems to go naturally with this.

To me, muses were always somewhat desexualized -- acorporeal and/or not participating in physical interaction, and only vaguely associated in appearance with a particular gender. (Generally that means either generically androgynous in appearance, rather like I imagine Ariel in "The Tempest," or wearing an old-fashioned outfit which is both feminine and nonsexual.)

It's interesting to see the male muses appearing a bit more "sexy" -- do you think that is just a 21st century thing or is it related somehow to the female perspective?

HilbertAstronaut said...

I also neglected to mention a number of interesting points in the article, especially some involving Charles Williams. I'll get to those as soon as I get the chance.

Kate said...

I suspect (and this is me extrapolating wildly here, so make of it what you will) that some of the 'sexy' is the times we live in, and a lot of it is the highly-sexual focus of much of the fanfic itself.

As to it being the female perspective, I don't know. I can say that female writers with female muses generally follow the desexualized-muse trend much more closely -- the occasional exceptions I've seen have all been lesbian writers. Even then most of the lesbian writers with female muses are fairly desexualized.

Male writers with male muses? No idea, not a whit. Very few male fanfic writers out there.

You're making me think about this. That rocks. :) Course I should be working, but that's how it goes.

Also, there's a kitten asleep on my desk.

Kate said...

Brilliant! More points good. :)

HilbertAstronaut said...

:-D

Here are some self-critiques of the original article:

1. Charles Williams (hereafter identified as "CW") analyzed "celibate marriage" in at least one of his nonfiction works (on the history of Christianity -- perhaps "Descent of the Dove"?). He clearly understood the chief objection, though seemed enthralled by the idea (I seem to recall he called it a "grand experiment").

2. I think the Dion Fortune novels in question were mentioned on the coherence-l CW discussion list, so I can recover titles.

3. My chief objection to celibate marriage is: "What are you trying to prove?" If you're demonstrating willpower, then don't show off; we aren't impressed. If you're practicing theurgy, then don't make a public display of it, because probably someone can do it better than you. ("Look at me, I'm powerful!!!" ZAP!)

4. I need more references to the Sts. Francis and Clare legends.

5. I also need some more quotes to demonstrate the "womanliness" of Beatrice in the Divine Comedy. Some of these may come from CW's commentary, or perhaps from Dorothy Sayers' footnotes to her translation.

6. I should provide specific quotes from CW's "Descent into Hell" and "Many Dimensions."

7. Victorian-era angels are usually portrayed as highly feminine -- not the stern male faces of Eastern iconography. Is this an instance of the Victorians coopting angels as another form of Muse?

8. Would Paracelsus happen to have rituals along these lines? Presumably they come from somewhere specific in the Western esoteric tradition. CW has an interesting ritual in the beginning of one of his Arthurian poems (perhaps "Taliessin into Logres"?) -- from where did he get that form?

9. I should clarify the "underlying general principle" -- unresolved tension sublimated. I have a book of symbols at home (author was a 20th century Spanish Jesuit, can't remember the name at the moment) whose "Hanged Man" article observes that successfully keeping a secret (that is, maintaining a state of tension) gives one a sense of occult power and superiority (hence the weird secret rituals of fraternities and the like).

Michael Shirk said...

Interesting post!

I too have wondered about males with male muses. I've heard it suggested that St. John of the Cross can sound that way with Jesus.

In all my reading in the Western Esoteric Tradition, which I give at least a *bit* of credence to, it's always so heterosexual, thus not terribly appropriate to me.

HilbertAstronaut said...

Michael -- that's interesting about St. John of the Cross -- I've always been scared to read him because I feel completely outclassed, like reading a topology textbook in Kindergarten! ;-)

The western esoteric tradition does tend to have a heterosexual focus, but I usually see this as merely a choice of images that related to commonly admissible experience of the time, rather than something implicit to the philosophy. Sexuality is thus merely a metaphor for creativity, generator and vessel, subject and object, etc. Hence it should be possible to construct new images that relate to the experience of other sexualities. I've seen a "gay Tarot deck," for example, though I didn't investigate at the time to see whether the correspondences were worked out in full. I'm not interested in "sex magick," but it does seem that certain forms of neopaganism (which owes a heavy debt to the western esoteric tradition) do incorporate alternate sexualities into their imagery and ritual.